Category: JUDGEMENTS
Past Misconduct Cannot Be Basis for Punishment Unless Cited in Show Cause Notice or Inquiry Report: Supreme Court
The Supreme Court’s ruling in Satpal Singh is more than a technical clarification—it is a judicial guardrail that reinforces the values of fairness, transparency, and accountability in workplace discipline. By insisting that punishment must be rooted in charges that are disclosed and tested, the Court has strengthened the rule of law in employment relations. In a ruling that reasserts…
//
Internal Committee Cannot Inquire into Complaint Against Employer: Delhi High Court
The Delhi High Court’s judgment in X vs. Akademi is more than a procedural correction—it is a judicial reaffirmation of the PoSH Act’s core principles: fairness, independence, and protection from retaliation. By drawing a clear line between IC and LC jurisdiction, the Court has fortified the architecture of workplace justice. In a landmark ruling that redefines procedural boundaries under India’s…
//
Search
Categories
- AMEMNDMENT (3)
- Andaman & Nicobar (1)
- FACTORY ACT (1)
- GRATUITY (1)
- JUDGEMENTS (2)
- News (2)
- POSH (1)
- Uncategorized (1)
Recent Posts
- A New Dawn or a Troubling Shift? Gujarat’s Factories Amendment Bill Ignites Debate Over Worker Rights and Economic Revival
- Principal employer responsible for paying ESI for contract labour involved in construction, repair, and maintenance: Karnataka HC
- Rajasthan Assembly Passes Landmark Factory Act Amendments: Longer Shifts, Expanded Overtime, and Night Work for Women
- Past Misconduct Cannot Be Basis for Punishment Unless Cited in Show Cause Notice or Inquiry Report: Supreme Court
B-20, West Patel Nagar, New Delhi-18 (India) | 011-39330001 |
+91-762-691-24-36 | Email: info@peoplemanager.co.in


